About L. Alan Winters

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far L. Alan Winters has created 83 blog entries.

BP 51 – The Costs of Brexit

Download Briefing Paper 51 Briefing Paper 51 – December 2020 Ilaria Fusacchia, Luca Salvatici and L. Alan Winters Key Points Introduction The Baseline Modelling Trade Policy The Effects of Brexit Incomes and Welfare Is the Global Tariff an Improvement? Has Signing a Free Trade Agreement Helped? Conclusion Key points Even with the free trade agreement (FTA) announced on Christmas Eve, Brexit increases UK-EU trade costs, reduces trade between them, and requires resources for form-filling, queuing, etc. These in turn, lead to changes in consumption which reduce UK residents’ welfare. Exports of value added will fall by nearly 5.5% relative to a pre-Brexit scenario and GDP by 4.4%. If there had been no FTA, each of these harms would have been about one-third larger and the variability of the losses across sectors would have been larger. The biggest losses in UK exports to the EU are predicted to be in motor vehicles, chemicals, and food. These large declines in gross exports of goods reduce the indirect exports of their suppliers of services very significantly Brexit will have a major impact in terms of reducing global value chains. The competitiveness of UK inputs into EU exports will induce declines in [...]

By , , |2025-12-17T15:38:43+00:0024 December 2020|Comments Off on BP 51 – The Costs of Brexit

Briefing Paper 51 – THE COSTS OF BREXIT

In this paper, the authors update their previous analysis of Brexit to reflect the presumed Free Trade Agreement (FTA). They assess the costs of Brexit with such an FTA and ask how much benefit the FTA will deliver relative to ‘No Deal’.  This paper improves on previous analyses by including more detailed modelling of the costs of doing trade and of the barriers to services trade that the exit from the Single Market will introduce.  Even with a deal, Brexit increases UK-EU trade costs, reduces trade between the two partners, and requires resources for form-filling, queuing, etc. The net effect is that the UK’s GDP will be 4.4% lower than in the absence of Brexit, compared with 5.5% lower if there had been no deal. Read Briefing Paper 51: The Costs of Brexit

Post-Brexit trade for development: an unfulfilled promise

15 October 2020 Max Mendez-Parra is Senior Research Fellow at the Overseas Development Institute. Ian Mitchell is a senior fellow and the director of development cooperation in Europe at the Center for Global Development.  L. Alan Winters is Founding Director and Fellow of the UKTPO. Three years ago, the government pledged “to help improve access to UK markets for world’s poorest countries post-Brexit.” To assess that promise, we have analysed how the United Kingdom’s new Global Tariff (UKGT) affects low- and lower-middle income countries (LICs and LMICs). We found that in terms of tariffs, access will not actually improve for up to 95 LICs and LMICs, though neither will their exports be materially damaged. Still, Cameroon, Cote D’Ivoire, Ghana and Kenya are yet to roll over their trade deals and risk facing higher trade tariffs with the UK if no agreement is reached. […]

By |2025-07-18T10:24:34+01:0015 October 2020|UK - Non EU|0 Comments

BP 48 – The “bearable lightness” of Brexit on the ACP countries’ trade: global value chains and rules of origin

Download Briefing Paper 48 Briefing Paper 48 – September 2020 Pierluigi Montalbano, Silvia Nenci, Nicolo Tamberi and L. Alan Winters Key Points Introduction: Brexit and ACP countries Do ACP countries’ incomes depend significantly on UK-EU trade? Cocoa, Brexit and Rules of Origin Conclusion Appendix and References Key Points Brexit will impinge on the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries currently governed by the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) negotiated by the EU. The main reason for this is that UK incomes, and hence demand for ACP products, will be lower than expected over at least the next decade. There is also a concern that the new Brexit-induced frictions on UK-EU trade will reduce the demand for ACP inputs into the goods that the UK and EU trade with each other: so-called “indirect effects” on exports. Our empirical results show that, while these “indirect effects” on ACP countries’ exports may exist, their economic effects will be tiny in aggregate even in the case of a ‘No Deal’ Brexit. This is because the ACP countries supply only small amounts of inputs into the products involved in UK-EU trade. In addition, we show that in one industry in which ACP inputs are [...]

By , , , |2025-12-17T15:36:27+00:0014 September 2020|Comments Off on BP 48 – The “bearable lightness” of Brexit on the ACP countries’ trade: global value chains and rules of origin

Briefing Paper 48 – THE “BEARABLE LIGHTNESS” OF BREXIT ON THE ACP COUNTRIES’ TRADE: GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS AND RULES OF ORIGIN

This Briefing Paper considers how Brexit will impinge on the African, Caribbean and Pacific (ACP) countries currently governed by the Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) negotiated by the EU. The authors explore whether the new Brexit-induced frictions on UK-EU trade will reduce the demand for ACP inputs – such as Cocoa products – into the goods that the UK and EU trade with each other. They conclude that the economic effects of even a ‘No Deal’ Brexit on ACP countries’ trade will be tiny in aggregate, because ACP countries supply only small amounts of inputs into the products involved in UK-EU trade. Read Briefing Paper 48: THE “BEARABLE LIGHTNESS” OF BREXIT ON THE ACP COUNTRIES’ TRADE: GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS AND RULES OF ORIGIN

BP 44 – Should the Brexit sterling depreciation have boosted exports? How exchange rates affect trade and prices

Download this Briefing Paper Briefing Paper 44 – July 2020 Yohannes Ayele and L. Alan Winters Key Points Introduction What has happened since 2016? Effect of Exchange Rate Changes on Prices and on Trade Quantities On consumer prices Global Value Chains Entry and Exit in Export Markets Understanding the UK Economy’s Response to the Brexit depreciation Conclusion Appendix and references Key Points The effects of exchange rate changes on prices and trade are difficult to predict with confidence. However, empirical results suggest that when a country depreciates its currency, import prices are likely to rise significantly, but by a smaller percentage than the depreciation. The extent to which these import price rises affect the cost of living and the cost of local production depends on the shares of consumption and inputs that are imported. Developed country exporters pass a relatively large portion of a depreciation onto importers of those products, the proportion being slightly smaller for more sophisticated goods and the more efficient exporters in a sector, and larger when the imported inputs account for a large share of production costs. The UK’s relatively heavy involvement in international value chains helps to explain why the June-2016 depreciation of [...]

By , |2025-12-17T12:00:20+00:0015 July 2020|Comments Off on BP 44 – Should the Brexit sterling depreciation have boosted exports? How exchange rates affect trade and prices

Briefing Paper 44 – SHOULD THE BREXIT STERLING DEPRECIATION HAVE BOOSTED EXPORTS? HOW EXCHANGE RATES AFFECT TRADE AND PRICES

In this briefing paper, Dr Ayele and Professor Winters look at whether the immediate effect of the result of the Brexit referendum –  the depreciation of sterling relative to all major currencies and the failure to increase UK exports after 2016  – could have been foreseen. They provide a brief description of recent UK trade history, followed by a review of different studies of the effect of exchange rate changes on trade prices, consumer prices and trade quantities. Finally, they explore the apparent effect of the sterling depreciation in June 2016 on UK trade and price behaviour.  The authors show that the pass-through of exchange rate changes to trade and consumer prices and thence to trade quantities is rather complex, and hence difficult to predict with any confidence. They conclude that the failure of UK exports to boom was in part due to the dramatic increase in trade-policy uncertainty that the Brexit result heralded. Read Briefing Paper 44: SHOULD THE BREXIT STERLING DEPRECIATION HAVE BOOSTED EXPORTS? HOW EXCHANGE RATES AFFECT TRADE AND PRICES

By , |2024-11-20T13:12:04+00:003 July 2020|Briefing Papers|0 Comments

BP 43 – UK-EU Free Trade Agreement: Please, Sir, I Want Some More

Download Briefing Paper 43 Briefing Paper 43 – July 2020 Peter Holmes, Julia Magntorn Garrett, L. Alan Winters Key points Introduction Trade in Goods – Rules of Origin Trade in Goods – Technical standards (TBT) Trade in Goods – Sanitary and Phyto-sanitary regulations (SPS) The Level Playing Field (LPF) and Government Procurement Trade in Services and Investment Three areas of difficulty The Temporary Movement of Natural Persons Conclusion Key points Both the UK and the EU have now published their draft texts for a Comprehensive Free Trade Agreement. The UK’s draft Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the EU is very different from the vision implied in the Political Declaration which the UK and EU agreed as the basis of their future negotiations. The various points of divergence would require long and complex negotiations to resolve. In some areas the UK is unwilling to agree such deep integration as the Political Declaration foresaw and which the EU is seeking; the most infamous of these is the so-called level playing field, but it also includes government procurement rules. The UK protests that these are not consistent with the ‘ordinary’ FTA that it seeks with the EU. In other areas, the [...]

By , , |2025-12-17T16:24:00+00:003 July 2020|Comments Off on BP 43 – UK-EU Free Trade Agreement: Please, Sir, I Want Some More

Briefing Paper 43 – UK-EU FREE TRADE AGREEMENT: PLEASE, SIR, I WANT SOME MORE

The UK’s draft text for the Free Trade Agreement with the EU indicates a vision of where the Government wishes to take the UK’s trade relationship with the EU. In some areas, the UK is unwilling to agree such deep integration as the Political Declaration foresaw and which the EU is seeking. However, in other areas, the UK is asking for more integration than the EU ordinarily offers partners in simple FTAs. This paper discusses four of these extensions in detail and provides further analysis of the implications for the negotiation process and future UK-EU trade. Read Briefing Paper 43: UK-EU FREE TRADE AGREEMENT: PLEASE, SIR, I WANT SOME MORE

A Trade Bargain to Secure Supplies of Medical Goods

12 June 2020 Simon Evenett is Professor of International Trade and Economic Development at the University of St. Gallen, and coordinator of the Global Trade Alert. He is an Associate Fellow of the UKTPO. L. Alan Winters CB is Professor of Economics and Director of the UKTPO. The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted trade policy, along with everything else.  As nations scrambled this year to source medical supplies – equipment, drugs and personal protective equipment – 89 governments imposed 154 restrictions on exports. What is much less well known is that 154 reforms easing imports of these goods were implemented by 104 nations too. It took a pandemic for some policymakers to grasp that taxing imported soap makes no sense. As well as up-ending trade in the medical goods, these policy shifts have the unintended consequence of providing the foundation for a new trade bargain between nations over medical supplies. As a sizeable and reliable exporter of these goods this matters for the UK and comes at the time when British ministers and officials want to showcase an independent trade policy. It is at times like these—when the big beasts of the world trading system are at loggerheads—that, traditionally, the free [...]

By , |2025-07-18T10:34:05+01:0012 June 2020|UK - Non EU, UK- EU|0 Comments
Go to Top