About Manuel Tong Koecklin

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Manuel Tong Koecklin has created 10 blog entries.

The rise of China in the US backyard amid Trump Tariffs

The uncertainty caused by the trade policy actions undertaken by the Trump administration poses a serious challenge to the world, but particularly to regions that historically relied on the United States both as a commercial and political ally, such as Latin America. The Trump 2.0 regime has levied a baseline 10% tariff on most Latin American countries[1], including those that have a Free Trade Agreement (FTA) with the US, such as Chile (2003), Peru (2009), Colombia (2012), and Panama (2012). The uncertainty surrounding the permanence of such measure (and the potential for further protectionist actions) will encourage these countries to seek and consolidate more secure trade links with like-minded partners, with more predictable trade policies. Such a shift has already been happening. The US has gradually been losing its relevance as the main trading partner for some Latin American countries, particularly those in the south, with one key actor playing a central part in this story: China. China’s penetration in the South American market over this century has been taking place at different levels. Regarding trade, China has Free Trade Agreements in force with Pacific countries like Chile (2006), Peru (2010) and more recently with Ecuador (May 2024). Trade and [...]

BP 83 – How Much Free Trade in UK Free Trade Agreements?

Download Briefing Paper 83 Briefing Paper 83 - July 2024 Adriana Brenis, Michael Gasiorek and Manuel Tong Koecklin Key points Introduction UK exports and MFN tariffs Preference utilisation rates Rules Of Origin Determinants of preference utilisation Conclusion Key points The UK has signed continuity agreements with South Korea (2019) and Canada (2020), to maintain the terms of the previous EU deals with both trading partners, as well as the Trade and Cooperation Agreement with the EU (2021). In 2022, the EU, Canada and Korea accounted for 45.2%, 1.5% and 1.1% of UK exports respectively. These deals provide for zero preferential tariffs on most UK exports to these countries. In practice, not all exports utilise the preferential tariff rates. In 2021, under the UK-EU deal, the ‘Preference Utilisation Rate’ (PUR) was 69%, rising to 74% in 2022. For UK-Korea, the rates were 60% and 56% respectively, while for Canada they were only 30% and 52%. Preference utilisation will typically depend on the level of the Most Favoured Nation (MFN) tariffs. The higher the tariff, the greater the incentive to use the preference. Other factors such as the value of trade; as well as how difficult it is for firms [...]

By , , |2025-12-17T16:38:10+00:0018 December 2024|Comments Off on BP 83 – How Much Free Trade in UK Free Trade Agreements?

BP 75 – Joining the CPTPP: Economic Opportunities and Political Dilemmas of Future Expansions for the UK

Download Briefing Paper 75 Briefing Paper 75 – July 2023 Guillermo Larbalestier, Minako Morita-Jaeger, Nicolò Tamberi, and Manuel Tong Koecklin Key points Introduction Assessing the economic potential from the CPTPP Further policy considerations Political and institutional dilemmas that can arise from expansion Conclusion Key points: Accession to the CPTPP will not lead to substantial economic gains for the UK. Any such gains will largely depend on possible future expansion of the CTPPP, primarily should China ever accede, and to a lesser extent Taiwan, Costa Rica, Ecuador and Uruguay who have also applied to join. The UK’s current engagement in CPTPP supply chains is limited especially when compared to its relations with the EU and the US. However, further expansion of the CPTPP could create possibilities for the UK to strengthen supply chains with acceding CPTPP countries. In part this arises from a set of standardised CPTPP ‘rules of origin’ across all members. However, for some products, these are more restrictive than the UK has with those countries through recently signed bilateral agreements. Product-specific analysis is required to understand which products could benefit from the CPTPP ROOs arrangements. China’s accession into the CPTPP seems highly unlikely both on geopolitical [...]

By , , , |2025-12-12T10:42:55+00:0024 July 2023|Comments Off on BP 75 – Joining the CPTPP: Economic Opportunities and Political Dilemmas of Future Expansions for the UK

Briefing Paper 75 – JOINING THE CPTPP: ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AND POLITICAL DILEMMAS OF FUTURE EXPANSIONS FOR THE UK

In this Briefing Paper, its authors consider the potential economic opportunities for the UK arising from the current CPTPP in comparison with the likelihood of further expansion in the future. They evaluate the UK’s economic opportunities with both current and potential CPTPP members, including trade in goods, trade in services, supply chain relationships and rules of origin. They also compare the CPTPP’s policies, with those of current and potential CPTPP members and explain why the UK Government should develop and articulate a strategic plan based on the political reality surrounding the CPTPP. Read Briefing Paper 75: JOINING THE CPTPP: ECONOMIC OPPORTUNITIES AND POLITICAL DILEMMAS OF FUTURE EXPANSIONS FOR THE UK.

Driving round the bend: Rules of origin and cars

8 June 2023 Michael Gasiorek is Director of the UK Trade Policy Observatory and Co-Director of the Centre for Inclusive Trade Policy. He is Professor of Economics at the University of Sussex Business School. Peter Holmes is a Fellow of the UK Trade Policy Observatory and Emeritus Reader in Economics at the University of Sussex Business School. Manuel Tong Koecklin is a Research Fellow in the Economics of Trade at the UK Trade Policy Observatory and University of Sussex Business School. Recently, there have been a series of reports in the media focussing on the challenges that electric vehicle (EV) manufacturers are likely to face, from the end of this year, in exporting electric vehicles tariff-free to the EU. The concern it because of the changes in the rules of origin (ROOs) requirements (for EVs and batteries) which will become more difficult from January 2024, and again from 2027 and 2028 onwards. […]

BP 74 – The UK’s new (and improved?) Developing Countries Trading Scheme

Download Briefing Paper 74 Briefing Paper 74 – April 2023 Mattia Di Ubaldo, Guillermo Larbalestier and Manuel Tong Koecklin Key Points Introduction No more conditions, deeper preferences and less uncertainty Who will really benefit from the changes in the Enhanced DCTS access criteria? More favourable rules of origin for LDCs Conclusion Key Points Non-reciprocal trade preferences are a policy tool that can promote export-led growth in developing countries. In the UK, the current scheme – the Generalised Scheme of Preferences (GSP) – will be replaced by the Developing Countries Trading Scheme (DCTS) in 2023. The new DCTS introduces minimal changes to the preferential tariff schedules across the three sub-schemes. Instead, there are changes in the eligibility criteria for countries to access the more preferential Enhanced Preferences sub-scheme; and changes in the rules of origin (RoOs) enabling use of the preferences under the Comprehensive Preferences sub-scheme offered to Least Developed Countries (LDCs). Potential duty savings for countries moving from the GSP General Framework to the DCTS Enhanced Preferences are very small, as these countries do not trade much in products benefiting from GSP or DCTS preferences. However, the new system offers greater certainty which can contribute to growth and [...]

By , , |2025-12-12T10:41:30+00:0013 April 2023|Comments Off on BP 74 – The UK’s new (and improved?) Developing Countries Trading Scheme

Briefing Paper 74 – THE UK’S NEW (AND IMPROVED?) DEVELOPING COUNTRIES TRADING SCHEME

This year, the UK Government will replace its current preferential trading scheme for low and lower-middle income countries with the Developing Countries Trading Scheme (DCTS). This Briefing Paper looks at and evaluates two key changes in the DCTS: changes in the eligibility criteria for the Enhanced Preferences sub-scheme, and changes in the rules of origin to use preferences under the Comprehensive Preferences sub-scheme offered to Least Developed Countries (LDCs). Using a novel RoOs Restrictiveness Index, the authors find that the RoOs under the DCTS are, on average, less restrictive than those under the former scheme. They also conclude that most benefits are likely to be accrued by LDCs both in the short and long term due to more lenient rules of origin, extended cumulation rules, and being eligible for the Enhanced DCTS if they graduate from LDC status. Read Briefing Paper 74: THE UK’S NEW (AND IMPROVED?) DEVELOPING COUNTRIES TRADING SCHEME

BP 72 – Preference utilisation in the TCA: how are we doing?

Download Briefing Paper 72 Briefing Paper 72 – December 2022 Nicolò Tamberi and Manuel Tong Koecklin Key Points Introduction Distribution of PURs across products and between the UK and EU Composition issues Conclusion Key points For UK-EU trade, the TCA grants tariff-free trade – providing that the product originates in the partner country and can be shown to originate. Obtaining proof of origin can be costly, and in some cases, the cost may outweigh the duty saving under the preferential regime. While in principle the trade barriers imposed by the TCA are the same for trade going in either direction across the Channel, the utilisation of preferential tariffs differs between the EU and the UK. EU exporters are utilising preferences more than UK exporters – 8 percentage points more on total trade. UK exporters tend to use preferences more where the value of trade is larger, while this does not apply to EU exporters, who use preferences more generally. There are also big differences in the use of PURs in the Textile and Clothing sector. As well as the bureaucratic costs of proving origin, the underlying restrictiveness of the rules of origin themselves, is likely to affect the [...]

By , |2025-12-17T11:52:36+00:0019 December 2022|Comments Off on BP 72 – Preference utilisation in the TCA: how are we doing?

Briefing Paper 72 – PREFERENCE UTILISATION IN THE TCA: HOW ARE WE DOING?

This Briefing Paper compares the preference utilisation rates (PURs) of both the UK and EU imports under the Trade and Cooperation Agreement. PURs tell us the amount of eligible imports that come in tariff-free (that is, preference eligible in a free trade agreement, the extent to which preferences are being used) and allow for the evaluation of the effectiveness of a trade agreement. We find that the utilisation of preferential tariffs differs between the EU and the UK. EU exporters are utilising preferences more than UK exporters and UK exporters tend to use preferences more where the value of trade is larger. The Paper analyses the distribution of PURs across products and composition issues to identify reasons for low utilisation rates. Read Briefing Paper 72: PREFERENCE UTILISATION IN THE TCA: HOW ARE WE DOING?

By , |2024-11-20T12:53:34+00:001 December 2022|Briefing Papers|0 Comments
Go to Top