About Ilaria Fusacchia

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Ilaria Fusacchia has created 4 blog entries.

BP 51 – The Costs of Brexit

Download Briefing Paper 51 Briefing Paper 51 – December 2020 Ilaria Fusacchia, Luca Salvatici and L. Alan Winters Key Points Introduction The Baseline Modelling Trade Policy The Effects of Brexit Incomes and Welfare Is the Global Tariff an Improvement? Has Signing a Free Trade Agreement Helped? Conclusion Key points Even with the free trade agreement (FTA) announced on Christmas Eve, Brexit increases UK-EU trade costs, reduces trade between them, and requires resources for form-filling, queuing, etc. These in turn, lead to changes in consumption which reduce UK residents’ welfare. Exports of value added will fall by nearly 5.5% relative to a pre-Brexit scenario and GDP by 4.4%. If there had been no FTA, each of these harms would have been about one-third larger and the variability of the losses across sectors would have been larger. The biggest losses in UK exports to the EU are predicted to be in motor vehicles, chemicals, and food. These large declines in gross exports of goods reduce the indirect exports of their suppliers of services very significantly Brexit will have a major impact in terms of reducing global value chains. The competitiveness of UK inputs into EU exports will induce declines in [...]

By , , |2025-12-17T15:38:43+00:0024 December 2020|Comments Off on BP 51 – The Costs of Brexit

Briefing Paper 51 – THE COSTS OF BREXIT

In this paper, the authors update their previous analysis of Brexit to reflect the presumed Free Trade Agreement (FTA). They assess the costs of Brexit with such an FTA and ask how much benefit the FTA will deliver relative to ‘No Deal’.  This paper improves on previous analyses by including more detailed modelling of the costs of doing trade and of the barriers to services trade that the exit from the Single Market will introduce.  Even with a deal, Brexit increases UK-EU trade costs, reduces trade between the two partners, and requires resources for form-filling, queuing, etc. The net effect is that the UK’s GDP will be 4.4% lower than in the absence of Brexit, compared with 5.5% lower if there had been no deal. Read Briefing Paper 51: The Costs of Brexit

Briefing Paper 35 – BREXIT AND GLOBAL VALUE CHAINS: ‘NO-DEAL’ IS STILL COSTLY

A great deal of attention has been devoted to the consequences of different forms of post-Brexit trade policy for UK exports. But focusing on the gross value of UK exports – e.g. the decline in exports of completed cars as the cost of exporting to the EU rises – is only part of the story because it misses the effects on the sectors and other countries that supply inputs into UK goods. In this Briefing Paper, the authors unpack value chains to identify which sectors and countries create the value that is embodied in UK flows of exports and imports, and hence to identify how the changes in trade induced by a ‘No deal’ Brexit will affect the value contributed (i.e. the incomes generated) by different sectors and countries. Studying only the effects of ‘No deal’ on the costs of conducting goods trade, but following them throughout the British economy, the authors find that ‘No deal’ could reduce UK GDP by 4% relative to remain. Moreover, because of the decline in incomes and the fact that services are key inputs into manufactured exports, the incomes generated in services sectors would also be around 4% smaller. Read Briefing Paper 35 – BREXIT AND [...]

BP 35 – Brexit and global value chains: ‘No-deal’ is still costly

Briefing Paper 35 – July 2019 Ilaria Fusacchia, Luca Salvatici and L Alan Winters Key Points Introduction Trade in value added The Baseline Modelling Brexit The effects of a ‘No deal’ Brexit Conclusion Footnotes Bibliography Online Appendix Key points The production of exports depends on value chains – between firms in one country and, through global value chains (GVCs), across international borders. Thus exports from one UK sector depend on value added from (and hence generate incomes in) other UK sectors and other countries. Trade policies and the costs of doing trade apply to the gross value of a trade flow (e.g. a tariff is levied on the whole value of an imported car). But focusing on gross value – e.g. the decline in exports of cars as the cost of exporting to the EU rises – may be misleading because it misses the effects on the sectors and other countries that supply inputs into UK cars. Even after the immediate logistical disruptions have been smoothed out, a ‘No deal’ Brexit will cut trade with the EU, and although trade with other countries, e.g. China, will increase, it will not do so by enough to make up the loss. Moreover, [...]

By , , |2025-12-12T10:51:22+00:001 August 2019|Comments Off on BP 35 – Brexit and global value chains: ‘No-deal’ is still costly
Go to Top