About Erik Millstone

This author has not yet filled in any details.
So far Erik Millstone has created 5 blog entries.

BP 38 – Destruction of the Union: too high a price to pay for a US trade agreement

Download Briefing Paper 38 Briefing Paper 38 – December 2019 Emily Lydgate, Chloe Anthony, Erik Millstone Key Points Introduction The current state of affairs What will replace the EU and allow for a UK ‘Single Market’? The UK’s alternative futures Policy recommendations Footnotes Key points: A UK-US trade agreement would likely require changes to UK domestic legislation in very sensitive areas, including drug pricing and food safety regulation, which Scotland, with its large Remain-voting majority and stated desire to maintain alignment with EU regulation, would strenuously oppose. Leaving the EU creates a legal and policy vacuum regarding the relationship between devolved nations, and the extent to which they can influence UK trade negotiations. By not taking Scotland’s interests sufficiently into consideration, the UK risks fuelling the Scottish independence movement and/or introducing internal trade barriers between England, Wales and Scotland (Northern Ireland will be subject to separate arrangements anyway). The UK Government may be forced to choose between facilitating trade with the US or holding on to the UK’s fragile national identity. The destruction of the UK internal market – and potentially the Union itself – seems too high a price to pay for a US Free Trade Agreement. [...]

By , , |2025-12-12T11:45:24+00:0010 December 2019|Comments Off on BP 38 – Destruction of the Union: too high a price to pay for a US trade agreement

Briefing Paper 38 – DESTRUCTION OF THE UNION: TOO HIGH A PRICE TO PAY FOR A US TRADE AGREEMENT

The importance of EU rules to maintaining open borders within Ireland has been at the centre of UK and EU negotiations. Yet what is less appreciated is the significance of those rules for achieving frictionless trade between England, Scotland and Wales. In this Briefing Paper, the authors highlight that leaving the EU could create new border trade barriers inside the UK, and opens up questions about how – and whether – the devolved nations will unite with England on external trade agreements. They argue that a US trade negotiation poses a serious threat to the unity of the United Kingdom because it would likely require changes to UK domestic legislation in very sensitive areas, including drug pricing and food safety regulation, which Scotland, with its large Remain-voting majority and stated desire to maintain alignment with EU regulation, would strenuously oppose. The authors argue that devolved nations should have a formal role in the setting of UK negotiating objectives, to ensure, among other things, that external trade agreements do not lead to internal trade barriers. Read Briefing Paper 38: DESTRUCTION OF THE UNION: TOO HIGH A PRICE TO PAY FOR A US TRADE AGREEMENT

By , , |2024-11-20T13:15:17+00:001 December 2019|Briefing Papers|0 Comments

Border posts at Gretna Green? Loosening food safety legislation could put Union under serious strain

5 November 2019 Border posts could be required at Gretna Green and the Severn Bridge in response to widening regional standards in food safety that could open up after Brexit, our new Briefing Paper warns. Our analysis warns of the potential for very different regulatory approaches between the UK Government and devolved authorities towards controversial food practices including chlorinated chicken, GM crops and pesticides. The existence of such discrepancies would likely have a significant and detrimental impact on the UK’s ability to strike trade deals, analysis by Dr Emily Lydgate, Chloe Anthony and Prof Erik Millstone has warned. […]

By , |2025-09-05T12:14:31+01:005 November 2019|UK- EU|3 Comments

Briefing Paper 37 – BREXIT FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION AND POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR UK TRADE: THE DEVIL IN THE DETAILS

As set out in the EU Withdrawal Act (2018) the government’s approach to Brexit is to transfer EU law into UK law and address any deficiencies in that law by secondary legislation. This Briefing Paper examines post-Brexit food safety legislation and finds that the UK’s post-Brexit  safety rules fall short of the level of protection currently provided by the EU and, in some cases, they give ministers broad discretion to make future changes without full parliamentary scrutiny.  This would provide a relatively clear path for a UK Prime Minister to overcome parliamentary opposition to any new trade agreements that cover agricultural and food products, such as US-UK FTA. Also, Brexit food safety legislation allows for devolution which could undermine both the UK’s ability to undertake a unified approach to external trade agreements and also the maintenance of the UK’s internal free movement of goods. Read Briefing Paper 37 BREXIT FOOD SAFETY LEGISLATION AND POTENTIAL IMPLICATIONS FOR UK TRADE: THE DEVIL IN THE DETAILS

By , , |2024-11-20T13:15:39+00:002 November 2019|Briefing Papers|0 Comments

BP 37 – Brexit food safety legislation and potential implications for UK trade: The devil in the details

Download Briefing Paper 37 Briefing Paper 37 – November 2019 Emily Lydgate, Chloe Anthony and Erik Millstone Key Points Introduction Preparing UK Food Safety Legislation For Brexit Deep Regulatory Reform, Not a Technical Exercise Will The UK Agricultural and Food Safety and Standards Legislation be Functionally Equivalent to That of The EU? Pesticide Approvals and Maximum Residue Levels in Food and Feed GMO Authorisations and Labelling Food Additive Authorisations and Monitoring Micro-Biological Food Safety Trade Implications Conclusions Recommendations Footnotes Key points The Government’s approach, as set out in the EU Withdrawal Act (2018), is to transfer EU law into UK law and address any ‘deficiencies’ in that law (such as references to EU institutions) by secondary legislation. This has resulted in a large body of new food safety legislation that replaces EU legislative processes and institutions with those of the UK. Detaching UK food safety regulation from EU bodies, while maintaining agricultural and food systems that are no less harmful to the environment and public health, is a challenging task. This is because the UK must develop capacities, competencies and procedures that have not been required or available domestically for many years. It is thus implausible to suggest, [...]

By , , |2025-12-12T10:54:33+00:001 November 2019|Comments Off on BP 37 – Brexit food safety legislation and potential implications for UK trade: The devil in the details
Go to Top